We seem to be moving from technology inspired by Star Trek to tech straight out of books by Douglas Adams?
This is not my observation. I was on the podcast WB-40 this week, talking about crowdfunding, narrative hooks, and how to preserve a lightness of being. Here it is, WB-40 episode 288: Crowdfunding.
After we were done recording, Lisa Riemers, one of the hosts, commented that my recent projects could have come straight out of The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy.
She’s right!
Poem/1 is a box that displays one-off poetry to tell the time! A Vogon invention if ever there was one. Hey, only a week to go on the Kickstarter, check out the campaign!
Galactic Compass orients you to the central supermassive black hole of the galaxy. I’ve lost count of the people who have connected it with the Total Perspective Vortex.
Now this tickles me.
Because:
The URL of this blog is interconnected.org - I’ve been blogging here since February 2000 - and it’s named for the project that originally occupied the homepage. That project’s strap line: Exploring the fundamental interconnectedness of all things.
Which is from Douglas Adams’ Dirk Gently books.
It’s a long-running association for me, it turns out.
There’s a gag that technology is inspired by Star Trek.
Tricorders are smartphones. Touch screen computing and voice computing are both in the standard kit of the Trek universe. Communicator badges and universal translators provide a North Star for wearables; the Holodeck is an inspiration for virtual reality.
Now who knows what the direction of influence here is, actually.
Other sci-fi has had outsized impact too: tablets and video calls in Kubrick’s 2001 for instance. The Young Lady’s Illustrated Primer as an educational device in The Diamond Age by Neal Stephenson.
Etc.
Star Trek is always the one that gets mentioned though.
And yet –
The most useful new concept of the 2020s is that of vibes. Vibe is as real as momentum, and should be as studied and theorised, imo.
See, AI is the most Douglas Adams of all technologies.
Large language models, GPT-2, GPT-3, ChatGPT and all the rest, are relatively simple under the hood. There’s not much complexity to the code, so I’m told. But there is a monstrous quantity of data and training.
OpenAI didn’t invent the transformer architecture LLM. But they were the first to do the engineering to make it really, really big, and see what happened. That it would work out was unexpected!
Here, read about the invention of the Infinite Improbability Drive from Adams’ Hitchhiker’s:
The principles of improbability were known:
The principle of generating small amounts of finite improbability by simply hooking the logic circuits of a Bambleweeny 57 Sub-Meson Brain to an atomic vector plotter suspended in a strong Brownian motion producer (say a nice hot cup of tea) were of course well understood…
But the physicists were stuck on how to generate an infinite improbability field.
Until, one day, a student who had been left to sweep up the lab after a particularly unsuccessful party got to thinking…
If, he thought to himself, such a machine is a virtual impossibility, then it must logically be a finite improbability. So all I have to do in order to make one is to work out exactly how improbable it is, feed that figure into the finite improbability generator, give it a fresh cup of really hot tea … and turn it on!
He did this, and was rather startled to discover that he had managed to create the long sought after golden Infinite Improbability generator out of thin air.
Look.
I do not intend to reduce Sam Altman and Greg Brockman’s astounding accomplishments at OpenAI to giving the computer a cup of really hot tea and turning it on…
…only, maybe, kinda haha, perhaps??
It is absurdly improbable that you can hoover up the internet, shred it, then talk to the mulch pile and it talks back.
Truly this is the age of Douglas Adams technology.
Look around you!
I was in a Waymo robot taxi the other week, it went wrong, and
It’s empty! (I tried to say by waving my arms.) I’m in a haunted car! I can’t tell the ghost what to do!
someone should make a dating app where an LLM clone of you goes on thousands of dates with LLM clones of other people, and then your matches are when the LLMs decide to date each other.
They continue, you can literally build this right now, and later in the thread, it gets trained on your iMessages.
I mean, it’d work!
Let me point out Adams’ Electric Monk:
The Electric Monk was a labour-saving device, like a dishwasher or a video recorder. Dishwashers washed tedious dishes for you, thus saving you the bother of washing them yourself, video recorders watched tedious television for you, thus saving you the bother of looking at it yourself; Electric Monks believed things for you, thus saving you what was becoming an increasingly onerous task, that of believing all the things the world expected you to believe.
An Electric Monk for dating??
Why not. It’s very now.
It is the Adams Age.
So I’m into this.
When technology becomes absurd, we must respond with absurd inventions.
More than that, we must straight-faced embrace the absurdity. Otherwise the pomposity of today’s technology will eat us alive.
Nick Foster, previously head of design at Google X, makes the vibe shift point much more eloquently in a recent essay:
Emboldened by seemingly unrestrained growth, tech companies large and small began to position their products not only as new ideas but as culturally important moments, ruptures in the status quo or accelerations of our species. Their presentations became increasingly slick and the language became self-assured, bombastic and confident.
Foster brings a counterpoint. He doesn’t say we should back away from new technology, but we should understand it for what it is:
In truth, genuinely ‘new things’ are almost always unresolved, unrefined and uncertain.
And, generously, he uses my own Poem/1 as an example of what he calls a “stumbling Bambi”, products that are finding their feet and blinking in the sunlight as they figure out the world around them.
A more honest approach.
The Douglas Adams Age may well be absurd but that’s because the technology itself is absurd.
Why shouldn’t our tech products make us giggle, boggle and see ghosts?
(And btw being unserious, which is what I’m advocating here, doesn’t let us off the hook re: paying attention to what our tech does in the world.)
I’m left with two thoughts:
A. What else should we make? Here’s a list of Douglas Adams’ sci-fi inventions! Let’s go?
If you enjoyed this post, please consider sharing it by email or on social media. Here’s the link. Thanks, —Matt.
‘Yes, we’ll see them together some Saturday afternoon then,’ she said. ‘I won’t have any hand in your not going to Cathedral on Sunday morning. I suppose we must be getting back. What time was it when you looked at your watch just now?’ "In China and some other countries it is not considered necessary to give the girls any education; but in Japan it is not so. The girls are educated here, though not so much as the boys; and of late years they have established schools where they receive what we call the higher branches of instruction. Every year new schools for girls are opened; and a great many of the Japanese who formerly would not be seen in public with their wives have adopted the Western idea, and bring their wives into society. The marriage laws have been arranged so as to allow the different classes to marry among[Pg 258] each other, and the government is doing all it can to improve the condition of the women. They were better off before than the women of any other Eastern country; and if things go on as they are now going, they will be still better in a few years. The world moves. "Frank and Fred." She whispered something to herself in horrified dismay; but then she looked at me with her eyes very blue and said "You'll see him about it, won't you? You must help unravel this tangle, Richard; and if you do I'll--I'll dance at your wedding; yours and--somebody's we know!" Her eyes began forewith. Lawrence laughed silently. He seemed to be intensely amused about something. He took a flat brown paper parcel from his pocket. making a notable addition to American literature. I did truly. "Surely," said the minister, "surely." There might have been men who would have remembered that Mrs. Lawton was a tough woman, even for a mining town, and who would in the names of their own wives have refused to let her cross the threshold of their homes. But he saw that she was ill, and he did not so much as hesitate. "I feel awful sorry for you sir," said the Lieutenant, much moved. "And if I had it in my power you should go. But I have got my orders, and I must obey them. I musn't allow anybody not actually be longing to the army to pass on across the river on the train." "Throw a piece o' that fat pine on the fire. Shorty," said the Deacon, "and let's see what I've got." "Further admonitions," continued the Lieutenant, "had the same result, and I was about to call a guard to put him under arrest, when I happened to notice a pair of field-glasses that the prisoner had picked up, and was evidently intending to appropriate to his own use, and not account for them. This was confirmed by his approaching me in a menacing manner, insolently demanding their return, and threatening me in a loud voice if I did not give them up, which I properly refused to do, and ordered a Sergeant who had come up to seize and buck-and-gag him. The Sergeant, against whom I shall appear later, did not obey my orders, but seemed to abet his companion's gross insubordination. The scene finally culminated, in the presence of a number of enlisted men, in the prisoner's wrenching the field-glasses away from me by main force, and would have struck me had not the Sergeant prevented this. It was such an act as in any other army in the world would have subjected the offender to instant execution. It was only possible in—" "Don't soft-soap me," the old woman snapped. "I'm too old for it and I'm too tough for it. I want to look at some facts, and I want you to look at them, too." She paused, and nobody said a word. "I want to start with a simple statement. We're in trouble." RE: Fruyling's World "MACDONALD'S GATE" "Read me some of it." "Well, I want something better than that." HoME大香蕉第一时间
ENTER NUMBET 0016hilegua.org.cn hb-365.com.cn hiqhrn.com.cn www.jqchain.com.cn www.ukerd.net.cn www.qnchain.com.cn ugnfxc.com.cn www.voam.com.cn www.wzhdyj.com.cn wpobsd.com.cn
We seem to be moving from technology inspired by Star Trek to tech straight out of books by Douglas Adams?
This is not my observation. I was on the podcast WB-40 this week, talking about crowdfunding, narrative hooks, and how to preserve a lightness of being. Here it is, WB-40 episode 288: Crowdfunding.
After we were done recording, Lisa Riemers, one of the hosts, commented that my recent projects could have come straight out of The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy.
She’s right!
Now this tickles me.
Because:
The URL of this blog is
interconnected.org- I’ve been blogging here since February 2000 - and it’s named for the project that originally occupied the homepage. That project’s strap line:Which is from Douglas Adams’ Dirk Gently books.
It’s a long-running association for me, it turns out.
There’s a gag that technology is inspired by Star Trek.
Tricorders are smartphones. Touch screen computing and voice computing are both in the standard kit of the Trek universe. Communicator badges and universal translators provide a North Star for wearables; the Holodeck is an inspiration for virtual reality.
Now who knows what the direction of influence here is, actually.
Other sci-fi has had outsized impact too: tablets and video calls in Kubrick’s 2001 for instance. The Young Lady’s Illustrated Primer as an educational device in The Diamond Age by Neal Stephenson.
Etc.
Star Trek is always the one that gets mentioned though.
And yet –
The most useful new concept of the 2020s is that of vibes. Vibe is as real as momentum, and should be as studied and theorised, imo.
And, as previously discussed, we are in the midst of a Vibe Shift.
Why shouldn’t that touch technology too?
See, AI is the most Douglas Adams of all technologies.
Large language models, GPT-2, GPT-3, ChatGPT and all the rest, are relatively simple under the hood. There’s not much complexity to the code, so I’m told. But there is a monstrous quantity of data and training.
OpenAI didn’t invent the transformer architecture LLM. But they were the first to do the engineering to make it really, really big, and see what happened. That it would work out was unexpected!
Here, read about the invention of the Infinite Improbability Drive from Adams’ Hitchhiker’s:
The principles of improbability were known:
But the physicists were stuck on how to generate an infinite improbability field.
Until, got to thinking…
Look.
I do not intend to reduce Sam Altman and Greg Brockman’s astounding accomplishments at OpenAI to giving the computer a cup of really hot tea and turning it on…
…only, maybe, kinda haha, perhaps??
It is absurdly improbable that you can hoover up the internet, shred it, then talk to the mulch pile and it talks back.
Truly this is the age of Douglas Adams technology.
Look around you!
I was in a Waymo robot taxi the other week, it went wrong, and
So, so Adams.
Another:
I’ve talked before about AI virtual girlfriends and swarming fractional micro-boyfriends. Then I saw this idea fly by on Twitter yesterday, half trolling half real:
They continue, and later in the thread, it
I mean, it’d work!
Let me point out Adams’ Electric Monk:
An Electric Monk for dating??
Why not. It’s very now.
It is the Adams Age.
So I’m into this.
When technology becomes absurd, we must respond with absurd inventions.
More than that, we must straight-faced embrace the absurdity. Otherwise the pomposity of today’s technology will eat us alive.
Nick Foster, previously head of design at Google X, makes the vibe shift point much more eloquently in a recent essay:
Foster brings a counterpoint. He doesn’t say we should back away from new technology, but we should understand it for what it is:
And, generously, he uses my own Poem/1 as an example of what he calls a “stumbling Bambi”, products that are
A more honest approach.
The Douglas Adams Age may well be absurd but that’s because the technology itself is absurd.
Why shouldn’t our tech products make us giggle, boggle and see ghosts?
(And btw being unserious, which is what I’m advocating here, doesn’t let us off the hook re: paying attention to what our tech does in the world.)
I’m left with two thoughts:
A. What else should we make? Here’s a list of Douglas Adams’ sci-fi inventions! Let’s go?
B. I wish he were here to see it.